Stbumble697

52 Billionaires In Florida Make Elite Forbes List - Tampa, FL - The 34th annual Forbes list of the world's billionaires includes 52 residents from Florida. Make Friends Online Girlfriend Social is the Gay Dating Service In Lakes By The Bay Florida largest free female friend making web page in the world. Our website lets Gay Dating Service In Lakes By The Bay Florida you create a profile about your hobbies, interests and location and that match with new friends. Florida Discount Drug Card This is a discount card can provide eligible single moms a discount on virtually all prescription drugs. The Florida Discount Drug Card is accepted by almost 5000 pharmacies. For more information on the card dial 866-341-8894. Florida Health Care Access Program.

Alligators, oranges and Florida Man are among the many things the state is known for, but beautiful natural swimming spots are some of the best things the Sunshine State has to offer.

From the Panhandle to the Keys, there are plenty of places to take a refreshing dip, but you don’t have to travel far from UCF to find a great place to swim.

Here are eight natural areas within two hours of campus that make for a perfect day trip. So put on your swimsuit, grab a sub and cover yourself with sunscreen before heading out into the water.

1. Kelly Park/Rock Springs Run

Distance from UCF: 45 minutes to an hour; 45 miles.

Entrance fee: $3- $5 per vehicle

Kelly Park is a 355-acre public park in Apopka. Its clear, swift creek and cool waters make for a beautiful day going with the flow of the natural spring, which pumps an average of 26,000 gallons per minute and is a cool 68 degrees year-round. In addition to the springs, the park features nearly seven miles of hiking trails, swimming hole, camping sites, picnic areas, volleyball courts, playground and the river head for the 10-mile Rock Springs run that connects to Wekiva Springs State Park.

Our advice: Get to the park early, as it often reaches capacity before noon.

What to do: Rent a tube from a vendor outside the park before you arrive and relax as you float .75 miles down the stream or play around in the huge natural swimming hole. The run takes about 30 minutes, but you can get out at many stops along the way.

2. Melbourne Beach

Distance from UCF: About an hour to an hour and 15 minutes; 64 miles

Entrance fee: None

Located near the Archie Carr National Wildlife Refuge in Brevard County, Melbourne Beach is home to the second-largest loggerhead sea turtle colony in the United States. Aside from sea turtle sightings, the location offers soft, white sand and bright blue water, which many surfers use to practice for the annual Founders Day Surfing Competition each May.

Our advice: Bring a change of clothes and explore the nearby shops and restaurants that make up this beach community, which is the oldest in Brevard County.

What to do: Try to keep up with the pros and hang 10 with your own board.

3. Blue Spring State Park

Distance from UCF: 45 minutes to an hour; 36 miles

Entrance fee: $6 per vehicle

This west Orange City attraction is known as a popular manatee refuge, but the refreshing 72-degree water is an awesome location for humans to take advantage of too. Feel free to bring along snorkeling, scuba diving and fishing gear to use in the spring. Hiking the 3.6-mile Pine Island Trail is a great way to also bird-watch. Limited camping capacity, which welcomes pets too, offers a quiet space that makes for a relaxing weekend getaway.

Our advice: As exciting as it may be to encounter manatees, swimming with them is NOT permitted at Blue Springs.

What to do: Manatee-watch as you paddle or float through the water.

Our advice: Hike the 4.2-mile Wild Persimmon Trail or stroll along the 1.5-mile paved nature trail to see a 600-year-old cypress tree.

What to do: After taking a dip in the water, walk through the butterfly garden, which displays 500 plants that welcome butterflies and hummingbirds.

5. Rainbow River

Distance from UCF: About an hour and 45 minutes to 2 hours; 100 miles

Entrance fee: $2 per person

Dunnellon’s Rainbow River features a small waterfall, multiple freshwater springs and abundant wildlife. This first-magnitude spring has multiple vents that push out 400 to 600 million gallons of 73-degree water daily. Jump into the crystal-clear 5.7-mile river for a swim, bring along a tube for a relaxing float or rent a kayak and paddle your way down.

Our advice: The parking lot has limited parking and usually fills up by 10 a.m. on the weekends, so be sure to get there early.

What to do: Pack your favorite snacks and lunch to enjoy a picnic on a grassy hillside before heading back home.

6. Jetty Park at Cape Canaveral

Distance from UCF: About an hour; 43 miles

Entrance fee: $25 for an annual pass

Jetty Park’s 35-acre facility, which is located in Brevard County, is a great space for enjoying the Florida sun. The park is only open to annual passholders at this time and includes access to 4.5 acres of sandy beaches where you can to swim and use paddle boards, boogie boards and kayaks. The 1,200-foot fishing pier is equipped with running water and fish-cleaning station to help make it easier to carry your catch back home.

Our advice: When arriving, pay attention to the roads to avoid unnecessary traffic by staying out of the boat entrance lane.

What to do: Check rocket launch schedules to make sure you catch a scenic departure during your visit.

7. Banana River

Distance from UCF: About an hour; 47 miles

Entrance fee: None

Although you can’t actually swim in the Banana River, it’s too cool a spot to miss! Located in Brevard Country and near Cocoa Beach, this waterway contains a diverse community of plant and wildlife, such as manatees, mangroves and 22 species of threatened or endangered animals.

Our advice: If you decide to take a boat out on the water, make sure to check the location’s rules and guidelines because there are specific regulations for where boats can be used.

What to do: Grab some bait and a fishing pole as you try to catch dinner within the 30 acres of grass flats, canals and shorelines that hide redfish, tarpon and more.

8. Devil’s Den

Distance from UCF: About 2 hours; 115 miles

Entrance fee: $15 Monday through Friday, $20 Saturday and Sunday; $38 for scuba divers

This prehistoric spring is hidden underground in a dry cave and is one of the most popular natural wonders in North America. The Williston city attraction’s water stays a cool 72 degrees all year-round, which makes it perfect for taking a break from the intense Florida heat. You can’t just swim in the water, but you can snorkel or scuba dive, and the proper equipment is available to rent on site. Many extinct animal fossils dating back to the Pleistocene Age have been found inside the cave and are on display at the University of Florida’s Museum of Natural History.

Our advice: Don’t miss a great photo op! Be sure to stop for a picture under the lush greenery that hangs over the water from an opening near the entrance.

What to do: After you’ve scheduled a snorkeling appointment, rent some gear and check the cave’s walls for ancient artifacts.

Maia Dougthie ’18 is a broadcast journalism graduate from UCF with a minor in political science. She is pursuing a career in wildlife filmmaking and photography and is currently headed to Zaragoza, Spain, to teach English while pursuing work in travel photography and freelance journalism. She shares her adventures and nature photography on Instagram at @maiaembarks or @maiadoughtie.

According to the Natural Resources Defense Council's recent study, Florida is one of 14 states predicted to face 'high risk' water shortages by the year 2050.^[1] The state's water is primarily drawn from the Floridan Aquifer as well as from the St. Johns River, the Suwannee River, and the Ocklawaha River. Florida's regional water conflicts stem primarily from the fact that the majority of the fresh water supply is found in the rural north, while the bulk of the population, and therefore water consumption, resides in the south. Metropolitan municipalities in central and south Florida have neared their aquifer extraction limit of 650 million US gallons (2,500,000 m³) per day, leading to the search for new, extra-regional sources.^[2]

North-South Water Conflict[edit]

Background[edit]

In 2003, a committee predominantly composed of real estate developers was appointed by Governor Jeb Bush to solve Florida's water disparity. Members were selected from the lobby group Council of 100 and in a 2003 report proposed 'a system that enables water distribution from water-rich areas to water-poor areas,' or the transfer of water through pipelines from the state's northern regions to its more developed and drier southern cities. The Suwannee river region was declared by committee member Lee Arnold to be 'sitting in the Saudi Arabia of water.'^[3] Representatives, citizens, and groups, such as the Florida Wildlife Federation, across the state argued that Governor Bush curb development in the south as opposed to further contributing to the water imbalance and restricting municipal water use even more. Half the state's fresh water is consumed by South Florida, which includes Miami-Dade County, Broward County, and Palm Beach County as well as the majority of the state's agricultural land, golf courses, and swimming pools. Legally, water in Florida is owned by the state, with five water management districts overseeing its regional use and distribution. State law allows the transfer of water from one region to another, but it stipulates this action as a region's last resort.^[2]

Resolution[edit]

The Council's report offered an incentive for northern regions to transfer water south, suggesting that excess supply may be sold for profit. However, Floridians responded with slogans such as 'Our water is not for sale!' Ultimately, more than 30 of the state's counties passed resolutions against the proposal, citing various concerns including overpopulation, uncontrolled development, sink holes, spring depletion, and saliniznation of groundwater supplies. As a result of the public's negative reaction towards the water-transfer proposal, Governor Bush rejected the Council's report. Instead, millions of dollars have been allocated to water development projects. The South Florida Water Management District plans to restore parts of the Everglades to ensure a continual water supply for its region.^[3]

Tampa Bay Conflict[edit]

The Tampa Bay water war is a conflict between Hillsborough County, Pasco County, Pinellas County, New Port Richey, St. Petersburg, and Tampa that has been going on since the 1970s over water supply. The Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD) is another key player. Created in 1961, it is a district in charge of 10,000 square miles (26,000 km²) over 16 counties; it has the responsibility to meet the water needs of all water users while additionally handling water resources efficiently.^[4] The West Coast Regional Water Supply Authority was created to handle the water efficiently.^[5]

History[edit]

By the early 1990s, the Tampa Bay area had failed to effectively collaborate on sharing their water resources. Eleven regional groundwater facilities serve nearly 90% of the water demand for the Tampa Bay Area. By legislative acts, Hillsborough, Pasco and Pinellas counties were required to work together collectively on a regional water system that would be more effective for using their water in a more environmentally safe and productive way.^[6] The group that was formed is West Coast Regional Water Supply Authority. Conflict arose over pumping rights as seen with Pinellas County continuing to purchase wells in Pasco County, and therefore using water before Pasco County inhabitants used their County's water. This also displayed the issue that water was owned traditionally by the land owners and permission was needed to use ground and surface water from the areas. Landowners were having major problems with the new sharing of sources and caused new litigation problems.^[7] A solution was made in 1991 when Pasco County was awarded the right to use their water first while allowing Pinellas County unlimited access to two well fields. Pinellas County continued to cause conflict by refusing to fund alternative water sources and prevented the development of such innovations. This caused further litigation between West Coast Regional Water Supply Authority and Southwest Florida Water Management District from 1994 to 1998 that resulted in zero progress for development in alternatives. The current Tampa Bay Water company cites in its history that the main reason behind zero development within the WCRWSA was that its members were unequally in control of water facilities, thus causing no unification on who was developing alternatives.^{[8][failed verification]}

With the combined problems of property impacts cited by homeowners, Pinellas County funded a campaign to advertise that the water scarcity issues were from drought not overpumping of aquifers, which was suspected of them. The solution to these litigation battles was the Florida Legislature demanding restructuring of the institutions at play and West Coast Regional Water Supply Authority became Tampa Bay Water by the Northern Tampa Bay New Water Supply and Ground Water Withdrawal Reduction Agreement in 1997. They would receive funding from the Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD) in order to research and develop new water sourcing alternatives.^[7]

Tampa Bay Today[edit]

The regions today are receiving water from three sources: ground water, desalinated seawater and river water. The three sources from the configuration plan made in 1998 were supposed to meet the Tampa Bay's needs until 2012.^[8] Their water sources include Alafia River, Hillsborough River, Tampa Bypass Canal, and Tampa Bay Seawater Desalination Plant. Tampa Bay Seawater Desalination Plant was originally issued for building in 1997, but after many delays in construction as well as performance failures, it was not fully functioning until 2007.^[9] It is currently providing 25 million US gallons (95,000 m³) a day.^{[citation needed]}

Future Plans[edit]

Tampa Bay Water has put together plans that are being explored from 2009 to 2013. Here is a list of some of the plans for the future:^{[citation needed]}

• Gulf Coast Seawater Desalination Plant - an additional desalination plant is a possibility that has the potential to provide 9 million to 25 million US gallons (95,000 m³) per day.
• Northern Tampa Bay Wellfields - This would increase the availability and allowance of using wellfields as a source of water.
• Small Footprint Reverse Osmosis in Pinellas County - Requires monitoring reverse osmosis and desalination techniques used in Tarpon Springs and Oldsmar. If the cities do not continue with their plans, Tampa Bay Water would consider using it for regional plans.
• Surface and Recharge Water Projects – Entails using additional water from Alafia River and Bullfrog Creek, reviewing additional surface water storage and possibly using reclaimed water.
• Tampa Bay Seawater Desalination Plant Expansion - Involves increasing the plant by 10 million US gallons (38,000 m³) a day.
• Thonotosassa Wells - Plans to research and evaluate whether this is an additional plausible source for future water needs.

Current conflicts[edit]

Although the counties are now successfully united under Tampa Bay Water, within the last year there have still been reported water shortages. The region's water supplies have dipped dangerously low and newer stricter precautions have been forced onto citizens for using water.^[10] Even with the plans for future water sources, it seems that with the growing population in the region and increasingly dry seasons, water scarcity is still a pressing issue.^[11]

Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint (ACF) Water War[edit]

Background[edit]

The three rivers involved are part of the ACF River Basin which stretches from northern Georgia down to Eastern Alabama and the Florida panhandle. The Chattahoochee River is fed mostly from surface water and has its origins in Georgia near Atlanta. It flows southwesterly crossing over the Alabama border and then merging with the Flint River near the Florida border to form the Apalachicola River. The Flint River also has its origins near Atlanta and heads southward but is fed by groundwater and has a lower flow than the Chattahoochee. The water from the Flint river is used mostly for agricultural purposes, while the water from the Chattahoochee is used mostly for municipal purposes. Florida depends on the freshwater of the Apalachicola River to mix with the salt water of the Gulf of Mexico in Apalachicola Bay. The $70 million oyster industry in Florida is concentrated in Apalachicola Bay and is very sensitive to salinity levels in the bay.^[12]

Conflict[edit]

The Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint (ACF) water war originated in the 1980s over a water rights dispute between Georgia, Alabama, and Florida. In 1986, Georgia suffered from a drought that lowered the levels of the Chattahoochee River and Lake Lanier to dangerously low levels, so low that the dam was not able to produce enough electricity for nearby Atlanta. As a result, in 1989, the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) proposed a 50% increase in water withdrawal from the river to provide fresh water to Atlanta's growing population. Out of fear that the river would not be able to maintain such use, Alabama filed a suit against the USACE in 1990 because they had not assessed the environmental effects of this proposal. Both Alabama and Florida were concerned about the proposal's effect on water quantity and quality downstream. Both states believed the flow would slow to a point that would damage their ability to provide hydroelectricity and maintain growth. They also believed freshwater withdrawal would increase the flow from pollution from upstream, which was a serious problem for Florida especially because of the oyster industry.^[12] By the end of the year, Florida had joined the suit, and the ACF water war became a tri-state conflict. In order to stay the suit, the federal government proposed the ACF Comprehensive Water Resources Study to analyze fully the effects of the proposed withdrawal and to assess the needs of the basin as a whole. Although the USACE originally claimed they had enough information initially, it took an additional eight years to complete the study.^[13]

Resolution Attempts[edit]

In 1992, the three states decided to remove the dispute from the legal courtroom until the USACE study was completed. In the meantime, water withdrawal levels were frozen and any changes had to be approved by all three states. When the study was completed in 1997, Alabama, Georgia, and Florida created a bill called the Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint River Basin Compact, which was introduced to each state legislature and to the United States Congress. The ACF Compact allowed each state to review the USACE study and then come to an agreement about water allocation by December 31, 1998. The bill was ratified by all three state legislatures and by the U.S. Congress later that year. Because of the gubernatorial elections in all three states in 1998, they decided to extend the deadline to December 31, 1999, and because of an issue with the Alabamian governor, the deadline was extended yet again to May 1, 2000. At this point Florida was becoming increasingly frustrated with the lack of progress and with the fact that Georgia would simply not agree to any minimum flow restrictions. The deadline was extended once more to August 1, 2000.^[12]

Millionaire Matchmaking In Lakes By The Bay Florida Reviews

Between 1999 and 2003, the deadline was extended 14 times, at which point, Florida dropped out of the negotiations because Georgia refused to compromise.^[3] In 2003, the USACE gave Georgia the rights to a quarter of the water in Lake Lanier for drinking water, and Alabama and Florida objected. After a series of lawsuits between 2003 and 2008 and a record drought in 2007, Georgia's rights to the water in Lake Lanier were denied, stating that the change required congressional approval.^[14] After several attempts at appeal, it seems Georgia has lost the fight for water rights, but a negotiation has yet to be made. The three states have until 2012 to make a final compromise.^[15]

Millionaire Matchmaking In Lakes By The Bay Florida Map

References[edit]

1. ^Altman, Pete (16 July 2010), Climate Change, Water, and Risk: Current Water Demands Are Not Sustainable, Natural Resources Defense Council
2. ^ ^abGoodnough, Abby (September 27, 2003). 'Developers Urge Support of Water Transfer to Populous South Florida'. The New York Times. Retrieved August 29, 2016.
3. ^ ^abcBarnett, Cynthia (2007). Mirage: Florida and the Vanishing Water of the Eastern U.S. The University of Michigan Press.
4. ^'District History'. Southwest Florida Water Management District. 2018. Retrieved 3 February 2020.
5. ^DEDEKORKUT, AYŞIN (2005). 'CHAPTER 4 ─ TAMPA BAY WATER WARS: FROM CONFLICT TO COLLABORATION'(PDF).
6. ^Scholz, John T.; Stiftel, Bruce, eds. (2005). Adaptive Governance and Water Conflict: New Institutions for Collaborative Planning. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future. ISBN978-1933115184.
7. ^ ^abRegan, Kevin E. (April 2018). 'Balancing Public Water Supply and Adverse Environmental Impacts Under Florida Water Law: From Water Wars towards Adaptive Management'(PDF). Florida State University Journal of Land Use and Environmental Law. 19 (1).
8. ^ ^ab'About Tampa Bay Water'. Tampa Bay Water. 2019. Retrieved 3 February 2020.
9. ^American Water, Fact Sheet: Tampa Bay Seawater Desalination Plant(PDF), Desal Response Group, archived from the original(PDF) on 25 July 201
10. ^Times staff (November 17, 2010). 'Southwest Florida water agency issues shortage alert'. St. Petersburg Times. Archived from the original on 13 October 2012.
11. ^Pitman, Craig (February 17, 2009). 'Tampa Bay area's water supply is in 'severe' shortage'. St. Petersburg Times. Archived from the original on 13 October 2012.
12. ^ ^abcStephenson, Dustin S. (Fall 2000). 'The Tri-state Compact: Falling Waters and Fading Opportunities'. Journal of Land Use & Environmental Law. Florida State University College of Law. 16 (1): 83–109. JSTOR42842761.
13. ^Leitman, Steven (2005). 'Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint Basin'. In Scholz, John T.; Stiftel, Bruce (eds.). Adaptive Governance and Water Conflict: New Institutions for Collaborative Planning. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future. ISBN978-1933115184.
14. ^'Georgia loses major water ruling on right to Lake Lanier'. U.S. Water News Online. February 2008. Archived from the original on 26 July 2008.
15. ^Redmon, Jeremy (27 November 2009). 'Diverse group forms to resolve water war'. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Archived from the original on 29 June 2011.